Media’s Impact on Consent in Interpersonal Relationships

Consent is often treated as a matter of individual communication or ethics. Media shapes that understanding. Long before people navigate intimacy themselves, they absorb cues about consent through repeated stories and images.

Those cues rarely emphasize clarity. Instead, media frequently teaches people to interpret hesitation, silence, or persistence as permission. Over time, ambiguity becomes legible as consent.

Media does not simply misrepresent consent. It teaches people how to read ambiguity as permission, and that lesson carries real interpersonal consequences.

Interpersonal Relationships: Consent in Media as Interpretation

Sexual consent is commonly defined as words or actions that communicate agreement to sexual activity in a coercion-free environment. This definition simplifies a more complex reality. Consent is not a single moment of approval. It is an ongoing process shaped by context, power dynamics, and social expectation.

Research on how students define consent highlights five recurring themes: permission, agreement, willingness, wanted-ness, and contextual elements. Among these, wanted-ness is central. Someone may agree to an interaction without actively wanting it. In those situations, consent appears intact on the surface while desire remains constrained.

Viewing consent as interpretive rather than transactional shifts attention away from technical compliance and toward which cues people are taught to trust. Misunderstanding does not emerge from silence alone, but from how silence is taught to be read.

How Media Normalizes Ambiguity

Media shapes how people interpret intimacy. Cultivation Theory explains how repeated exposure to media narratives influences perceptions of social norms. Social Cognitive Theory describes how people learn behaviors by observing what is modeled.

Together, these frameworks show how media teaches people what consent is supposed to look like. Television, film, and online content frequently depict romantic or sexual escalation without explicit verbal confirmation. Instead, consent is implied through persistence, body language, or the assumption that verbal clarification would disrupt intimacy.

These patterns do not stop at television or film. Social media reinforces them. Analyses of online discussions across platforms such as Twitter, Reddit, and Instagram show that many people rely on implicit cues rather than direct communication when interpreting consent.

Some women report avoiding verbal consent out of concern that it will “ruin the mood.” This hesitation reflects a media environment in which clarity is treated as awkward and ambiguity as desirable.

These portrayals do not explain consent. They model how to avoid talking about it.

Romanticized Ambiguity and Power

Popular media often presents ambiguous consent in interpersonal relationships as romantic, particularly when paired with intensity or devotion. The Twilight Saga is a clear example. Explicit conversations about boundaries are largely absent, while withdrawal, control, and nonverbal cues stand in for communication.

In these narratives, intimacy develops through tension rather than clarity. Possessiveness is aestheticized. Restraint becomes care. Repeated portrayals like this normalize ambiguity by presenting it as emotional depth rather than a point of pause.

The issue is not that these stories are fictional. It is that they are familiar. When media repeatedly frames unclear consent as passionate rather than problematic, it reshapes expectations for real relationships and positions explicit communication as unnecessary or disruptive.

Interpersonal Consequences

The consequences of this normalization are not abstract. College-aged women face disproportionately high rates of sexual assault, many of which occur in contexts where boundaries were assumed rather than clearly communicated. Media does not cause harm, but it contributes to environments where misinterpretation is common and accountability is diffuse.

When people are taught to prioritize mood over clarity, they are less likely to check in, ask directly, or slow escalation. Ambiguity does not create harm by itself, but it lowers the threshold at which harm becomes possible. It allows entitlement to coexist with plausible deniability. Discomfort is reframed as miscommunication instead of a warning signal.

Recognizing this dynamic does not require assigning intent. It requires acknowledging that interpretation is learned.

Implications for Consent Culture

Media shapes how consent is understood by normalizing clarity rather than obscuring it. Explicit communication does not undermine intimacy. It strengthens it.

When uncertainty is treated as erotic shorthand, the burden of interpretation falls unevenly, with real consequences for interpersonal safety. Consent is learned in public before it is practiced in private. Media that treats clarity as normal does not limit connection. It makes consent legible.

Updated January 19, 2026.

resources.

Bednarchik, L. A., Generous, M. A., & Mongeau, P. (2022). Defining Sexual Consent: 

Perspectives from a College Student Population. Communication Reports, 35(1), 12–24.

https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1080/08934215.2021.1974506

Beres, M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual

communication between casual sex partners. Culture health & sexuality, 12(1), 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050903075226.

Boot, I., Peter, J., & van Oosten, J. M. F. (2014). Impersonal Sex Orientation and Multitasking. Influence the Effect of Sexual Media Content on Involvement With a Sexual Character. Media Psychology, 17(1), 55–77. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1080/15213269.2012.742358

Gronert, N. M. (2022). Using popular media portrayals to investigate undergraduates’ perceptions of sexual consent. Gender & Education, 34(6), 643–658.

https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1080/09540253.2022.2027887

Pulido, C., Cañaveras, P., Redondo-Sama, G., & Villarejo-Carballlido, B. (2023). Do People Comment on Social Networks About Sexual Consent in TV Series? Rethinking Consent (or not) in Real Situations: Contributions from Debates in Social Media. Sexuality & Culture, 1–23. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1007/s12119-023-10115-w

Willis, M., Blunt-Vinti, H. D., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2019). Associations between internal and external sexual consent in a diverse national sample of women. Personality and

Individual Differences, 149, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.029.